• Latest
  • Trending
  • All
  • News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Science
  • World
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech

Oh no! More employment regulation

September 20, 2016
Health and Safety in African Mining

Health and Safety in African Mining

June 9, 2023
Shareholders Plan Legal Action Against Mining Company For Unethical Chrome Sale

Shareholders Plan Legal Action Against Mining Company For Unethical Chrome Sale

April 29, 2023
advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
B.E.D. Cape Town Branch: Consistency, Customer Service and Teamwork

B.E.D. Cape Town Branch: Consistency, Customer Service and Teamwork

April 29, 2023
Armcoil and Schneider Electric Partner to Deliver SKID Substations to Prominent Mining Group

Armcoil and Schneider Electric Partner to Deliver SKID Substations to Prominent Mining Group

April 29, 2023
Zest WEG’s Expanded Middelburg Branch – Improving Services and Delivery for Customers

Zest WEG’s Expanded Middelburg Branch – Improving Services and Delivery for Customers

April 29, 2023
Clear Gear™ Lubricant Sets a New Benchmark for Reliability in Mining

Clear Gear™ Lubricant Sets a New Benchmark for Reliability in Mining

April 30, 2023
The Agreement to Sell Three of Sappi’s European Graphic Paper Mills to the Aurelius Group Lapses

The Agreement to Sell Three of Sappi’s European Graphic Paper Mills to the Aurelius Group Lapses

April 29, 2023
One Platform to Rule All: Guanajuato Silver Selects Micromine

One Platform to Rule All: Guanajuato Silver Selects Micromine

April 29, 2023
Unlocking Value From Data To Drive Better Business Results

Unlocking Value From Data To Drive Better Business Results

June 6, 2023
Global Energy Leaders Named in Africa Oil Week Advisory Committee

Global Energy Leaders Named in Africa Oil Week Advisory Committee

April 29, 2023
Sappi’s Platinum Sustainability Status Is Once Again Verified by EcoVadis

Sappi’s Platinum Sustainability Status Is Once Again Verified by EcoVadis

April 25, 2023
Rosond Appoints Geotechnical Project Coordinator

Rosond Appoints Geotechnical Project Coordinator

April 25, 2023
  • African Mining Brief
  • Magazine Archive
  • Contacts
Saturday, June 10, 2023
African Mining Brief
No Result
View All Result
  • Login
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • People
  • Projects
  • Press Releases
  • Magazine Archive
MAGAZINE ARCHIVE
ADVERTISE
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • People
  • Projects
  • Press Releases
  • Magazine Archive
No Result
View All Result
African Mining Brief
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • People
  • Projects
  • Press Releases
  • Magazine Archive
Home Industrial Action

Oh no! More employment regulation

by Newton Mthethwa
September 20, 2016
in Industrial Action, Labour unions, Legal News
0
491
SHARES
1.4k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Aadil Patel and Boipelo Diale, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Recently, in the case of AMCU and Others v Buffalo Coal Dundee (Pty) Ltd and Another (JA42/2015) [2016], the Labour Appeal Court held that where a mining rights holder is not the employer it too must consult with the trade union insofar as the contractor intends to terminate employees’ employment for operational requirements.

In the recent case of Mnyandu v Padayachi (AR162/2014) [2016], meanwhile, an employee (Padayachi) applied for a protection order in terms of the Protection from Harassment Act, No 17 of 2011 (Act) after receiving an email from a colleague (Mnyandu) which was circulated at their place of employment in which certain allegations were leveled against Padayachi and three colleagues. Padayachi alleged that his colleague had circulated an email which was ‘defamatory, slanderous, libellous, dishonest, deceitful and malicious’. He contended that by circulating the email, Mnyandu ‘impaired his dignity, defamed him, adversely affected his wellbeing and undermined his opportunity for promotion and financial benefit’ at his place of employment by fabricating unfounded claims against him.

Padayachi could have utilised the common law to institute a claim for defamation or requested the employer to take disciplinary action against Mnyandu for her conduct. Instead, Padayachi used the Act to found his claim. Padayachi contended that that this email constituted harassment.

The Magistrates Court determined whether the conduct, ie the email sent by Mnyandu constituted harassment.

In s1 of the Act “harassment” is defined as:

‘directly or indirectly engaging in conduct that the respondent knows or ought to know

(a)   causes harm or inspires the reasonable belief that harm may be caused to the complainant or a related person by unreasonably:

(ii)  engaging in verbal, electronic or any other communication aimed at the complainant or a related person, by any means, whether or not conversation ensues; or

(iii) sending, delivering or causing the delivery of letters, telegrams, packages, facsimiles, electronic mail or other objects to the complainant or a related person or leaving them where they will be found by, given to, or brought to the attention of, the complainant or a related person;

‘harm’ means any mental, psychological, physical or economic harm.’

The Magistrates Court found that the email sent by Mnyandu was sufficient to constitute harassment in the workplace. The Magistrates Court issued a final protection order against Mnyandu.

The Magistrates Court should have stated that the Act does not apply to the workplace and dismissed the claim. Rather, the Court stated that the Act applies in the workplace. As a result, employers and employees have to now contend with yet another piece of legislation applicable in the workplace.

Mnyandu appealed to the High Court. On appeal, the High Court overturned the decision of the Magistrates Court and ruled in favour of Mnyandu. Although, the High Court found that the Act was applicable at the workplace, it found that Mnyandu did not harass Padayachi.

The High Court confirmed that the Act can apply to the workplace and may be useful in the work environment. Accordingly, the Act and the issuing of a protection order in terms of the Act extends to the workplace.

Tags: Cliffe Dekker HofmeyrNo 17 of 2011 (Act)the Labour Appeal Courtthe Protection from Harassment Act
Share196Tweet123
Newton Mthethwa

Newton Mthethwa

Jan - March 2023 Magazine

Health and Safety in African Mining

Health and Safety in African Mining

June 9, 2023
Shareholders Plan Legal Action Against Mining Company For Unethical Chrome Sale

Shareholders Plan Legal Action Against Mining Company For Unethical Chrome Sale

April 29, 2023
B.E.D. Cape Town Branch: Consistency, Customer Service and Teamwork

B.E.D. Cape Town Branch: Consistency, Customer Service and Teamwork

April 29, 2023

Trending News

  • Business Maverick Zunaid Moti Announces Departure from Moti Group

    Business Maverick Zunaid Moti Announces Departure from Moti Group

    1056 shares
    Share 422 Tweet 264
  • Scraper Winch

    692 shares
    Share 277 Tweet 173
  • Thyssenkrupp Uhde Expertise Extends the Life of Ammonia Tanks

    636 shares
    Share 254 Tweet 159
  • Slope Stability

    618 shares
    Share 247 Tweet 155
  • Underground Support Systems

    599 shares
    Share 240 Tweet 150
  • Another successful turnkey modular construction and transit solution from thyssenkrupp Uhde delivered to a key customer

    597 shares
    Share 239 Tweet 149
  • African Mining Brief
  • Magazine Archive
  • Contacts

© 2023 African Mining Brief I All Rights Reserved Powered by Clivo.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Events
  • Industry
  • People
  • Projects
  • Press Releases
  • Magazine Archive

© 2023 African Mining Brief I All Rights Reserved Powered by Clivo.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In